The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart illustrates the behavior of consuming packed food of USA people throughout the 10 years, from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, large number of people from USA visit restaurant for fast food once a week, while least people ate every day and ignore street food throughout the given time frame.
To begin with, in 2003, below 5% people visit restaurant and nearly 17% of American used to go for fast food every day and several times a week respectively. Similarly, large number of people love to visit restaurant once a week and once or twice a month, with above 30% and exactly 30% respectively. This figure was highest in 2003. Moreover, only 5% and around 13% people ignore and visit few time a year respectively.
In term of 2006 and 2013, both accounted lowest percentage at same level for eating fast food. However, 20% of people visit restaurant, while only approximately 16% people visit several time a week in 2006 and 2013 respectively. Furthermore, in 2006, highest percentage of American visit fast food restaurant with nearly 33% once a week, while in 2013, once or twice a month experienced its peak by same proportion. Moreover, in both year 2006 and 2013, a few times a year and never recorded equall proportion with exactly 15% and nearly 4% respectively.
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or Antarctica What are the benefits and disadvantages for people who visit such places 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task You have a full time job and you are also doing a part time evening course You now find that you cannot continue the course Write a letter to your teachers In your letter describe the situation explain why yo 73
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- Charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 61
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples fr 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'while the least'.
Suggestion: while the least
...t restaurant for fast food once a week, while least people ate every day and ignore street ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
... and around 13% people ignore and visit few time a year respectively. In term of 2006...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'accounted the lowest'.
Suggestion: accounted the lowest
...vely. In term of 2006 and 2013, both accounted lowest percentage at same level for eating fas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'several times'.
Suggestion: several times
...ile only approximately 16% people visit several time a week in 2006 and 2013 respectively. F...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the highest'.
Suggestion: , the highest
... 2013 respectively. Furthermore, in 2006, highest percentage of American visit fast food ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, similarly, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87214611872 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69444312787 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488584474886 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2476588962 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.7 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283647076488 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126613308714 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815279461685 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209486189998 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473875152789 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.7 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.