The graph below shoes the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The graph illustrates the consumption of different types of meat in a European country for each person per week between 1979 and 2004.
The consumption of all kinds of meat had a downward trend except for chicken. Also in 1979, the usage of Chicken was about 150 grams which was equal to the consumption of Lamb approximately. In addition, Beef and Fish were eaten 220 and 55 grams per week per person respectively.
Nevertheless, in this period of time the consumption of Beef and Lamb declined considerably and reached to 101 and 52 grams respectively by taking account of some fluctuations for the usage of Beef between 1980 and 1986. Besides, the eating of Fish decreased marginally and reached to just under 50 grams. It is worth considering that the trend of the usage of Fish was the most stable one in comparison with others. Moreover, by 2004 the consumption of chicken had soared to 250 grams.
In conclusion, since 1979 although the eating of Beef, Lamb, and Fish has fallen, the usage of chicken has experienced a substantial rise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-30 | nguyenvuonglinhchi | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls In the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 & 2002. 80
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 70
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- Using animals to test the safety of cosmetics or drugs used for medical reasons is never acceptable To what extent do you agree with this statement 80
- Damage of the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living. Do you agree or disagree? 80
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 180 200
No. of Characters: 843 1000
No. of Different Words: 95 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.663 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.683 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.766 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 48 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.149 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.453 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.669 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.113 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4