Technological advances is the precursor of the proliferation of AI robots in recent years. Why there is still a controversy about whether this may bring merits or shortcomings to future societies, I firmly believe that robotic machines will contribute a crucial part in improving human’s life.
On the one hand, it is notable that increasing preference for robots in workplaces could cause redundancies. Robotic machines which are well-programmed and could function constantly without a demand on salary could easily take the place of human workforce. Consequently, the unemployment rate may rise dramatically, exerting pressure on the government’s budget for allowance for the unemployed. Secondly, the more intelligent robots become, the more risks they could pose to humans. If these AI machines are developed for improper purposes, take Decepticons in the science-fiction movies called Transformer, as an exemplification, they could detrimentally harm humans, even leading to the destruction of the world.
On the other hand, these AI machines could be a great supporter for future societies. A significant point to consider is that robots, which are equipped with loads of information on various aspects, may substantially help to improve human life standard. For instance, many developed countries have made full use of robots in the medical sector by allowing robots to take the place of human doctors in special and difficult surgeries to raise the chance of success. Moreover, AI products could help to create a more convenient life. Thanks to types of robots with the ability to do household chores or to cook in restaurants, citizens who are under heavy workloads can now relax and enjoy themselves when arriving home with the help of robotic assistants.
In conclusion, albeit few side effects, I strongly believe that the advent of robotic machines will do wonders for human beings. These AI products must be used for right purposes and under control to guarantee that they would work efficiently without harming humans.
- Pie chart 78
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among people in society Do you think the advantage outweighs the disadvantage 89
- The diagram below give information about two road tunnels in one Australian city 89
- Some people believe that robots will play an important role in future societies while others argue that robots might have negative affect on society Discuss and give your opinion 84
- The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42319749216 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10884240382 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592476489028 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1179377058 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.571428571 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134944215642 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506225107576 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396537078262 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920590942466 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279110717571 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.