In the age of high technology, the advent of social networking sites has been gradually taking the place of face-to-face meetings in modern life. While this development is beneficial to a certain extent, I presume that this may rather bring shortcomings to our life.
It is no denying that technological breakthroughs have made human life infinitely more comfortable. The advent of social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter or Instagram has made interactions among people become easier than ever. Only by clicking the mouse, Internet users could find and make friends or contact with their families without any difficulties in terms of geographic boundaries. Besides, the Internet has done wonders for shopaholics as well when allowing them to make online purchases via various e-commerce sites such as Shopee, Lazada, to name but a few. Therefore, people nowadays tend to live on the Internet, and gradually lose their interest in conventional communication.
Unfortunately this phenomenon turns out to bring more repercussions than merits to the technophiles. A key rationale is that overreliance on the virtual world may lead to the loss of real life interactions. This may not only damage face-to-face relationships but also result in a serious lack of interpersonal skill. Additionally, the heavy exposure to the Internet could exert adverse bearing on users' mental health since Internet addicts who incline to glue their eyes on the screen all the time are susceptible to contract with anxiety and other psychological disorders. Consequently, they gradually lose their ability to interact physically and even could be isolated when exposed to the world outside.
In conclusion, even though technologically advances have obviously improved human life standards, I still lean towards the idea that this actually is an adverse development. Internet users should learn to balance online and physical interactions in order to not only maintain real life relationships but also to ensure that social network is used for appropriate purposes.
- Pie chart 78
- The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below give information about two road tunnels in one Australian city 89
- The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strengths are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, consequently, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50157728707 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15362446273 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615141955836 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8838607194 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.571428571 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117066174761 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406915476061 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572909080796 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728302258648 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203289418796 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.