The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The chart illustrates the number of visitors to a Caribbean island from 2010 and 2017.
Overall, the figures witnessed an increasing trend and more tourists generally chose to stay on the island rather than cruise ships.
In the beginning, a total of one million travelers chose this island as their destination, while almost 75% of them were willing to stay on the island instead of cruise ships. This inclination remained steady for island choosers for one year. Afterward, two more years of stable island stay led to a decline in 2016, when the cruise ship stay overtook the island stay. Despite the growth in 2017, this difference could not be compensated.
The surge in cruise ship stays was mostly inclining during this interval, except for 2012 when it dropped to its starting state at 0.25 million. Finally, the overall island visits reached 3.5 million by 2017, with the proponents of cruise ships standing at first place by a majority of 2 million individuals, and only 1.5 million travelers preferred to stay on the island during their trip.
- Task 2: Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have educational values. Discuss both views and give your oppinion. 78
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Cycling is a healthier and more environmentally friendly form of transport Nevertheless Cycling is getting less popular What are the reasons of this trend What can be done to make cycling more popular 89
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 89
- the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87570621469 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44194620743 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581920903955 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 177.0 22.4926829268 787% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 863.0 112.824112599 765% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 177.0 22.9334400587 772% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 37.0 5.23603664747 707% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16884268641 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16884268641 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142376606827 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103341898711 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 90.1 13.2329268293 681% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -91.26 61.2550243902 -149% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 70.0 10.3012195122 680% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.21 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.45 8.06136585366 192% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.4329268293 481% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 72.8 10.9970731707 662% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 11.0658536585 497% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.