The chat below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given illustration provides the percentage of residents who bought fresh/instant coffee and went to a café for coffee or tea in last 4 weeks in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, Hobart.
It is clear that the proportion of people’s fresh coffee buying was more than those of people’s instant coffee in both 5 cities of Australia. In addition to, residents of Melbourne liked going to coffee shops most.
People in five Australian cities showed their preference for instant coffee rather than fresh coffee: about 46%-43%; 48%-42%; 53%-33.5%;50%-34%;54%-38%. Furthermore, there was more a half of residents in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Hobart had drinking habits in cafes: about 61%; 63%; 56%;62% while there was about nearly 49% of people in Adelaide going cafes in last 4 weeks.
The results of this survey show that Brisbane had the number of people who bought instant coffee in last 4 weeks were high in comparison with people in Adelaide: about 53%-50%. Besides, the figures for fresh coffee buying in Brisbane was as nearly as in Adelaide: about 33.5% and 34%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-09 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-12 | Daniel3003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | susanti | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | anhalice | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Kaythlyn | 67 | view |
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 61
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 61
- The chat below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 67
- The charts below show the proportion of people s spending on different commodities and services in particular European country in 1958 and in 2008 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51917706032 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508571428571 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 175.0 22.4926829268 778% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 847.0 112.824112599 751% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 175.0 22.9334400587 763% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 44.0 5.23603664747 840% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245390005652 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.245390005652 0.103423049105 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156512237337 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557440328267 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 88.9 13.2329268293 672% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -89.23 61.2550243902 -146% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 69.2 10.3012195122 672% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.98 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.93 8.06136585366 185% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 52.0 11.4329268293 455% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 72.0 10.9970731707 655% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 89.0 11.0658536585 804% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.