The environmental issue is too complex to be handled by individuals
Earth is our home; so, we have to care about it. Unfortunately, currently, people deal with a significant number of problems related to environment. In this regard, some people believe that the issues are more complex than human abilities; therefore, it is not possible that individuals can solve it. However, I am of the opinion that claims every person with the help of each other can enhance the earth health. Two effective reasons to support my idea are elaborated in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, environment is under impact of humans and other species and the earth reinforces itself with human helps. For more clarification, humans are responsible for the most problems in the earth and environment, and they affect it, therefore, they can eliminate the terrible effects that are created by them. For example, global warming that is occurred because of human intervention such as using fossil fuels and over-utilization of cars and manufactures, disturbs biological balances. Although the problem is complicated, we can solve it by stopping or decreasing use of these dangerous materials. Some months ago, I read a piece of news in the science direct journal about the rate of warming of earth shows that due to human efforts in this realm, the level of global warming is diminished. This is a piece of evidence that proves the impact of individuals in saving the environment. Also, it is important to mention that the earth and nature want to survive; thus, they help us in this way.
Secondly, many rules and permissions that are enacted by governments is depended on each person’s comments. Governments have a massive abilities and facilities which can address the environmental concerns. People should opt a president who not only is meticulous about the mentioned problem but also endeavors to tackle them. By this strategy, people are effective in solving a complex problem when the elected president enacts restrictions in using plastics, fossil fuels, over-hunting and other harmful actions and behaviors.
To sum up, the world consists of individuals that all have their effects, and these accumulated effects can make the earth healthier. Hence, either by choosing a responsible does president or by limiting our dangerous lifestyle, all of us are responsible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | Fifi13 | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | kevin1105 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | prakriti malla | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-25 | prakriti malla | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | jimHsu | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One can learn about another person from the books and movies that the person likes 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People are never satisfied with what they have they always want something more or something different Use specific reasons to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement all university students should take basic science courses regardless of their field of study 70
- It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship Do you agree Why or why not Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and other harmful actions and behaviors To sum up the world consists of individu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07567567568 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84115121885 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518918918919 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 370.0 20.1344086022 1838% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1878.0 100.406767564 1870% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 370.0 20.6045352989 1796% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 108.0 5.45110844103 1981% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0673102618237 0.236089414692 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673102618237 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0452910287039 0.150856017488 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244671382565 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 187.5 11.7677419355 1593% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -304.07 58.1214874552 -523% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 147.6 10.1575268817 1453% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.66 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 26.0 8.01818996416 324% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 10.002688172 580% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 150.0 10.0537634409 1492% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 10.247311828 566% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.