A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that human must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent years, there has been dividing opinions regarding role of animals in human lives and animal rights. Some people claim that animals should be granted rights and respected by humankind, while the others hold a belief that animals must be employed for different purposes for us, including food supply and further research materials. These two opposite views will be discussed in this essay.
Although animals lose ability to express thinkings to human, it is impossible to deny the fact that animals still have their own lives. In other words, nature has given all animals, including us, rights to live and protect themselves from enemies. What is more, animals for long time has had to suffer from pain and human cruelty. Millions of livestocks have been euthanized for human food supplies and even some endangered species have been constantly threatened by poachers and habitat loss. Thus, it is crucial to stop exploiting animals for human purposes and animals themselves are worth gaining stronger protection from human.
However, people could terribly suffer from food scarcity if animals were free from human exploitation as meat from certain kinds of animals are playing an indispensable part in our everyday’s meals. Also, meat provides essential nutritions for us to grow and develop normally, prevents us from being undernourished. In addition, some animals are also provided for wildlife research. These research are necessary as it will aim to find solutions to combat current environmental issues, including climate change and ecosystem imbalance, and protect the biological diversity. Although we can minimize the number of harmed animals, it is obvious that animals are still essential for us and we cannot live a life without the presence of them
To sum up, while it is true that animals should be granted rights and treated as humans, animals still play a vital role in human life, notably providing meat and materials for further scientific projects. In my view, instead of jettisoning the use of animals, we should encourage local authorities and companies to limit the use of wild animals and natural habitats to protect them from being at risk.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-19 | mytinh | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-18 | snowacealex | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | Alexspector | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | Lê Nguyễn Hạnh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | bapcai | 73 | view |
- The percentage of the population living in urban areas has greatly increased in many countries Discuss some reasons for this change and some of its consequences for urban planning 93
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- With the increase in global tourism it has become obvious that there are many advantages and disadvantages that can be found from the effects of tourism Do you believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer 91
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that human must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discus 67
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ining stronger protection from human However people could terribly suffer from food ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, still, thus, while, even so, in addition, in my view, in other words, it is true, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56542951013 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 350.0 20.2975951904 1724% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1799.0 106.682146367 1686% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 350.0 20.7667163134 1685% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 139.0 7.06120827912 1969% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431092875006 0.244688304435 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.431092875006 0.084324248473 511% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290840258424 0.151304729494 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611145393286 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 177.8 13.0946893788 1358% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -283.77 50.2224549098 -565% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 139.8 11.3001002004 1237% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.01 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 25.15 8.58950901804 293% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 9.78957915832 541% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 142.0 10.1190380762 1403% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 53.0 10.7795591182 492% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.