Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student`s field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Do the universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study? The author contends so. Of course acquiring knowledge about variety of fields is a good thing, however, making compulsory for every students might go counterproductive. Hence, I strongly disagree with the author's assertion for the following reasons.
As the society contains variety of people, some are black, some are white, some are yellow, it contains variety of people with variety of interests. If one has interest in computer science, another may or may not have interest on it. Similarly, if one has interest in mathematics, and he has also interest in computer science, it is not necessarily true that another may have the same choice. If one has interest in taking the courses outside his field, in this case it is okay, but it usually not true. For example, if Ram is a student of a mathematics, and he has interest in computer science as well, when the university makes compulsory him to take computer science, for him it will be beneficial, however if there is another guy say Shyam, who is also a mathematics student, but he has not interest in computer science, if a university makes compulsory to take him the computer science course, Shyam might feel unnecessary burden upon him and eventually it may distract him.
Further, providing every student a choice would be prolific instead making it compulsory. For example, if one person has keen interest in making vehicles, then certainly, making him compulsory to take a philosophical class doesn't make sense. If a university makes him to take such course, he may eventually get bored and even can leave the university. Certainly it is not good.
In conclusion, requiring every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study, might be counterproductive.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 66
- The technology creates more problems than it solves and may threaten or damage the quality of life 62
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 33
- Only through mistakes can there be discovery or progress 50
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ve. Hence, I strongly disagree with the authors assertion for the following reasons. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ompulsory to take a philosophical class doesnt make sense. If a university makes him t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, similarly, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 310.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03225806452 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94571771587 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470967741935 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 103.719204921 60.3974514979 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.428571429 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228047048952 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103300550704 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133023709363 0.0758088955206 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20970027193 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124372968327 0.0667264976115 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.