The tables below show the reasons for travelling and the main issues for the travelling public.
The first table lists the major causes for travelling as told by different age groups while the second table shows the problems faced by these during their journey.
Overall, visiting friends and family and going to social events was more famous among young people whereas older generation mostly travelled for work. Secondly, young people were more worried about cost of travel and highway congestion while older people had higher concerns about safety.
40% of the individuals between 10-20 years chose to travel to visit their friends and family, while 35% did it to go to recreational events which was on average 7 times more than the rest of the age groups. People aged 21-30 years went outside mostly to commute to work at 52%. Similarly all those between 31 till 50 years also had work commute as their highest reason to travel.
As for the problems experienced by these travelers, the biggest one for people between 21-35 years of age was highway congestion at 51%. Whereas people between 36 till 75 years of age were more concerned for their safety while travelling, as much as 10 times more than the younger generation.
- The tables below show the reasons for travelling and the main issues for the travelling public 78
- The maps below show the town of Tennyson in 1990 and the present day 72
- The maps below show the city of Stokeford in 1930 and development plans for 2030 67
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- The graphs below show the number of hours people spent on social media per day from 2010 to 2016 as well as the reasons why they used them 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...tside mostly to commute to work at 52%. Similarly all those between 31 till 50 years also...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, whereas, while, as for, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94270833333 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2909977717 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2473446791 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207777405145 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100258839217 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719779053145 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144729652628 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641085292115 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.