It is not irrefutable that parents are a crucial role in human beings lives. Nowadays, few individuals argue that parents have a tremendous influence on infants life than technology equipment or friends. This easy intend to posit the pors to have parents.
To embark, their certain merits adhered to parents. First and foremost, it is clear that the parents significant in living every person lives today. To elaborate, in the modern era spread of surrounding crime and illegal employment. Owing to this, children face more difficulties in their lives. However, if they are sharing a feeling with parents, so they are only protected from bad influence. For example, we are not trusted as an outsider in the world. Thus, parents every time safety for their children and they are easily understanding of the infants.
Furthermore, few reasons can be accounted for considered this positive development. Firstly, the merely helpful of the parents their pupils. It is an analysis that children more time spent with family, due to they know about the family instead if they easily talk about any topic with parents. For example, parents have more knowledge about the nation. So they learn of the children about the living on the earth and they are learning about faithful people interaction. Resulting, today more people feel alone and they are not sharing difficult situation, due to they come in dispersion condition.
To sum up, there are multifarious benefits from living with parents. So, we do not neglect that Without parents do life spend more difficult
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 73
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'infants'' or 'infant's'?
Suggestion: infants'; infant's
... parents have a tremendous influence on infants life than technology equipment or frien...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...otected from bad influence. For example, we are not trusted as an outsider in the...
^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...time safety for their children and they are easily understanding of the infants. Furthermore, few rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13725490196 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65161844045 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8177007505 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.7777777778 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1666666667 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0831228349325 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305809402664 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380999720643 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0627710338577 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561399377499 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.