The given table compares the percentage of mobile phone sold globally by 6 different producers, particularly Nokia, Motorola, Samsung, Sony Ericsson, L.G, BenQ Mobile and others between 2005 and 2006.
Overall, worldwide market share of Nokia, Motorola and Sony Ericsson witnessed upward trends, while that of other producers went down. Also, the productions sold by Nokia accounted for the largest proportion and the percentage of BenQ Mobile was smallest.
Standing at the first rank in 2005 with 32.5 percent, the amount of mobile phone sold internationally by Nokia rose slightly by 2.5% in 2006. Similarly, there was a minimal increase from 6.3% to 7.4% in the proportion of Sony Ericsson. Compared with 2 producers above, the figures of Motorola saw a most considerable change of 3.4 percent between 2005 and 2006.
Whereas, the worldwide market share of L.G reduced from 6.7% in 2005 to 6.3% in 2006. Also, the proportion of Samsung and others experienced the similar trends, with the drop of 1 and 3 percent respectively. Although BenQ Mobile sold the smallest amount of mobile phone globally with only 4.9 percent in 2005, the figure declined markedly by nearly 50% in the very next year.
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives Therefore it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 84
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think it is happening How to solve this issue 71
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: G
...ia, Motorola, Samsung, Sony Ericsson, L.G, BenQ Mobile and others between 2005 an...
^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e of 3.4 percent between 2005 and 2006. Whereas, the worldwide market share of L.G redu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 41, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: G
...hereas, the worldwide market share of L.G reduced from 6.7% in 2005 to 6.3% in 20...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12755102041 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68704200014 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2959049126 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291836198214 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12709679298 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106708145322 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18512932313 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519712206428 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.