Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe that actions can be taken to bring about a change.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In this modern world, it is undeniable that human activity has taken a heavy toll on the flora and fauna diversity worldwide. Some people believe that this is unalterable, whereas it is widely thought by others that a change will change if governments take more steps. In my viewpoint, both views are justifiable; however, I would lean towards the latter.
To begin with, it is comprehensible why some people subscribe to the former. First and foremost, many rainforests which are currently regarded as many species’ habitats are gradually being devastated by human due to lack of land. To be more specific, this problem is claimed to be unchangeable because of the fact that the bigger population ar becoming, the more lands they need. In addition to this, by dint of the modernization of human society as well as their increasing demands, trees have always been chopped down in the interest of areas for construction, accomodation, and carpetry materials. For these justifications, this situation is believed to be immutable.
On the other hand, I am adherent to the belief that the given issue can be tackled by some pliable solutions. First of all, legislation has to be enacted by the parliaments about family planning in order that overpopulation could be hindered, and thereby minimizing the risk of deforestation for land. Furthermore, authorities should impose a high levy on everything to some of those who break the laws as a way of punishing. This will bring out positive outcomes because inclination towards money. Hence, this could be why a school of thought holds that this issue could be combatted.
In conclusion, while some people think that it is hard to address this problem, I would contend that everything could be solved if each individual makes effort.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world Some people think that this cannot be changed while others believe that actions can be taken to bring about a change Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 89
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down Others believe that zoos can be useful in protecting animals Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...s problem is claimed to be unchangeable because of the fact that the bigger population ar becoming, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, whereas, while, as for, as to, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08843537415 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98722347599 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598639455782 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6811835482 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.857142857 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7857142857 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320109579575 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997294707562 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520433873283 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186721196298 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412459093076 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.