It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Over the past few years, the issue of whether or not doing a job three days a week with long hours of work is more pleasure or having a career in five days with lower hours of working has received a great deal of attention from workers and employers. Although some may say that having fewer hours work in a day has more effectively than longer hours; I, as well as many others, believe that woke for long hours with lower days has many advantages such as having free time so people can spend their time for a second job, family members, and do pleasure activities.
First of all, an important reason why working three days a week is more enjoyable is that workers have much free time for spending time with family members and friends. Many psychologists assert that human need to allocate adequate time with their family members and friend for improving their mental condition. When people spend free time with families and friends, they would speak about their problems and finding suitable solutions. Also, they have a chance for making fun and pleasure time. Furthermore, parents must spend enough time with their children for playing, studying lessens, teaching some skills, and many other similar activities like that; hence, they are able to bring children in the best ways.
Another reason for this point of view is that people must spend part of their time improving healthy body conditions. Many diseases such as heart attack or blood pressure are starting because of lacking physical activities. As a result, when people must involve with many diseases, the rate of mental activities would decrease; hence, they may not do their duty as well as they can. In this situation, if workers have enough time for going to gyms, they would improve mental conditions. And, the yield of works will be increased.
Finally, it is occasionally said that a hectic lifestyle pushes people to work harder for earning more money. In the modern era, people must get involved in many financial problems, so if they can start a second job besides their main job, they will improve their financial solution. Consider a computer engineer, for instance. She works three days a week for long hours, but she has four days of free time. She can manage four days that work in other companies or start her own career as a programmer. In this situation, she is able to earn extra money for having pleasure life.
In conclusion, considering the ideas presented in the paragraphs above, I personally believe that working three-day a week with longer working hours is much more enjoyable than having a five-day job with longer working hours chiefly due to having more free times for spending with their families, doing a pleasure activity, and starting a second job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect in your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 73
- TPO23 80
- TOEFL TPO 47 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- Some people like to buy and eat their meals at restaurants frequently while others like to do this at home. Which do you prefer? Why? 70
- TPO 24 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
Over the past few years, the issue of whether or not doing a job three days a week with long...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2297.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88723404255 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38064950756 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468085106383 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.049385298 48.9658058833 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.894736842 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7368421053 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.31578947368 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365809754773 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128956472255 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127771530225 0.0737576698707 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265210157197 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146999762271 0.0645574589148 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 10.002688172 265% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.