Smoking should be prohibited in all public places even though it would restrict some of people's freedoms. Do you agree or disagree?
Discussions in regards to the limitations imposed by the authorities have always been on the agenda in the modern society. There is an opinion that individuals should be prohibited to smoke in social areas despite the fact that such prohibition potentially constrains the rights of those who enjoy having a cigarette. I completely agree with this statement and believe that freedom is only positive until it commences to violate someone else’s one.
Firstly, smoking a cigarette when surrounded by non-smoking people is an example of highly irresponsible behaviour. This is because passive smoking is proven to be noxious for those who happen to inhale the fume emanating from a burning cigarette. Therefore, a smoker negatively affecting their own health by their own choice also ends up being dangerous for other innocent people. For example, the relevant study conducted by WHO in 2018 shows that people undergoing the constant impact of passive smoking are receiving 60% more adverse substances in their lungs which in its turn leads to dreadful diseases including cancer. In other words, the health damage brought by public smoking is too significant to neglect.
Secondly, the scent of cigarette smoke is both disgusting and contagious. It means that citizens smoking nearby to others additionally foredoom them to distribute extremely unpleasant odor. Hence, influenced individuals appear to become less attractive which affects the quality of their social life and, therefore, deteriorates their well-being. For instance, a recent survey held by Tinder.com shows that 88% of respondents include foul smell in their top three indicators of an unfortunate date. Thus, passive smoking appears to be a culprit of personal issues as well.
In conclusion, I am absolutely assured that prohibition of public smoking should be viewed as an indisputable boon to our society as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-26 | Vlad_english | 84 | view |
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes Ohers say that this punishment is unacceptable in contemporary world Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- People are now living in a throwaway society where things are used for a short period of time and then thrown away What are the main problems associated with it What can be done about 84
- Restricting air travel is the only way to fight air pollution Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes Others say that this way of punishment is not acceptable in today s world Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes Others say that death penalty is unacceptable in contemporary society Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
Discussions in regards to the limitations imposed by the authorit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the modern society. There is an opinion that individuals should be prohibited to...
^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...putable boon to our society as a whole.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41891891892 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92853770504 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638513513514 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8334626624 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.571428571 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182327956498 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622893111882 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507364364703 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120228070324 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428295841384 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.