Some people think that new technology always improves the lives of workers. Others believe that it results in disadvantages for workers. Discuss both views and give your opinion
As every coin has two sides, there are predominantly two contrasting views where a section of society vehemently deems that technological advancements have been doing a wonderful job in the lives of employees while others emphasize that it has resulted in negative outcomes for laborers In this essay, I will discuss both views in detail and conclude my opinion.
On the one side, various factors make a section of people advocate that technology has given ample amount of benefits to the workers. To commence with, the fact that newly constructed machines have the ability to do multiple tasks at a single time. This kind of development has produced efficiency and productivity in the work. Apart from this, the workload has been reduced with the help of machines because of automated tasks which were initially handled by workers. However, it did not affect the jobs of laborers because they now monitored the machinery work.
On the flip side, modern technology has given some drawbacks to worker's lives. Firstly, employee forgets their hand skills as new technology comes in modern society. Secondly, there could a chance of a fault in technological devices which can be caused by an accident. This kind of incident would be a risk of losing life while working with flawed machines. Therefore, it is always advised to use and monitor the machine with a full potential focus in your work. Lastly, some workers face challenges to handle the software programs of newly constructed machines. Hence, technologies force some laborers to work out of their comfort zone.
To conclude, in my profound opinion, although using new technologies in the wrong way might result in severe effects, I think technology has given fruitful benefits and improved the life of workers by reducing the workload, increasing efficiency, and productivity in their daily tasks at work.
- An increasing number of developing countries are expanding their tourist industry Why do you think it is the case Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- Some people think that young people should be ambitious Others believe that it is fine if young people do not have big aims in life Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The education of young people is highly prioritized in many countries However educating adults who cannot write or read is even more important and governments should spend more money on this To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- You have just moved into a new home and are planning to hold a party You are worried that the noise may disturb your neighbor Write a letter to your neighbor In your letter introduce yourself describe your plans for the party invite your neighbor to come 56
- You have been invited to attend an interview for a place studying a course in a college Unfortunately because of a previous appointment you cannot come at the time they wish Write a letter to the admissions tutor explain your position apologize and offer 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oductivity in the work. Apart from this, the workload has been reduced with the h...
^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'handling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: handling
...k. Lastly, some workers face challenges to handle the software programs of newly construc...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, i think, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15460526316 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76905503235 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601973684211 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.1056617831 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.928571429 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252333246759 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683298268507 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694404606091 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145024893498 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704788256823 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.