Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person Do you think this is the best way to choose an employee or are there better alternatives What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion

The most of common and widely accepted method of hiring employees is job interviews. However, I believe that there are some better alternative methods for assessing a candidate for the job and a written test is one of them. In my opinion, candidates should be evaluated based on their performance in the written tests as well as the interview for a job.

Employers should not select or reject a candidate on the basis of the interview, which is merely a conversation of a few minutes. It is also concluded by a survey that most of the intelligent people are introverts / tend to be introverts and may not be able to perform better in interviews because of nervousness, although their performance in jobs are commendable. Therefore, to find an efficient employee, employers should conduct written test to evaluate aptitude and reasoning abilities as well as the technical proficiency. For instance, some departments of the government of Gujarat have eradicated the interview process and now they are selecting the employees based on the written tests only. For these reasons, employers should implement written tests or such other alternatives for choosing employees.

However, in a few jobs, it is necessary to have excellent communication skills. Hence, interviews are essential to evaluate these skills and also the overall personality of a person. For example, most of the jobs involve the direct interaction with team members and clients and thus employees in those jobs need to have strong communication skills and good personality. Moreover, employers can check the authenticity of the details mentioned in candidate’s CV during interviews. Therefore, it goes without saying that interview along with a written test is the best method of hiring employees and employers should consider the performance of a candidate in both parts while selecting an employee.

In conclusion, employers should not stick to interviews alone for the hiring process. Instead, they should look for other alternatives such as comprehensive written exams. In my opinion, the hiring process which involves interviews as well as written tests is the most effective as it deals with all the essential aspects required in a perfect employee.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, look, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29943502825 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06304061578 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477401129944 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7672988953 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203770576942 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734559311193 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436322851017 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13737887583 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384514845552 0.056905535591 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.