Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
The given statement tells us technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. The given statement is highly subjective, polemical and uses loaded words which compromise the effectiveness of the sentiment expressed. The statement defeats logic and comes across as nothing more than obvious generalization where words have been used in adequately and indefinitely. I disagree with this statement.
Technology has brought revoultionary changes to our life. Advancement in technology has solved many complicated problems of our life. There is no dearth of medical provisions to cure deadly diseases. Be it online shopping, online food delivery everything is possible at just one click. Internet has changed the world drastically. We can garner as much knowledge as we want from the content available online. There is no need to do household's chores manually. From washing machine to dish washing is possible with help of machines. Thus, we can say that technology has only simplified our lives rather than making it complicated.
As every coin has two sides. Technology has also its cons. Indiscriminate use of too much techology will excaerbate the things. Too much reliant on digital things will eradicate the habit of doing things manually. We will be entirely dependent on machines to do our daily life chores. Technology will eradicate the creative thinking and will make us feel handicapped. Now a days, we have car etc. as transport medium too much use of vechile as transport medium will result in spreading of pollution. Pollution will deteriorate the environment which can cater the earhquakes, landslide etc . If technology interferes with the environment, it will result in detrimental consequences. Thus, our life can be endangered and our survival will become complicated.
Further, it can be argued that technology only makes our lives complicated, it will be wrong to utter. Technology has its own pros and cons.
It can therefore be concluded that by using words in an indiscriminate and vague manner the sentiment expressed loses its sheen. The author of this argument could have made the statement a bit more effective by using words carefully; by using that in context are nothing more than obviously exaggerated this statement becomes severely limited in its appeal. Therefore, I reject this claim
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-13 | Aamena Afreen | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | jayauen | 50 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | Shubhan Mital | 79 | view |
| 2023-02-06 | wiloj50 | view | |
| 2022-10-02 | nidhi78 | 50 | view |
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 50
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework whereas in the district of Marlee most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no mo 57
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 16
- Technology while apparently aimed to simplify our lives only makes our lives more complicated 50
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...fectiveness of the sentiment expressed. The statement defeats logic and comes acros...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s rather than making it complicated. As every coin has two sides. Technology ha...
^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
...king and will make us feel handicapped. Now a days, we have car etc. as transport medium t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
... and will make us feel handicapped. Now a days, we have car etc. as transport medium t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... can cater the earhquakes, landslide etc . If technology interferes with the envir...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...appeal. Therefore, I reject this claim
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, if, so, therefore, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35294117647 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01167387935 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 23.0359550562 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.968533685 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.0344827586 118.986275619 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.8965517241 23.4991977007 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.65517241379 5.21951772744 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.83258426966 331% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309427450539 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759839266492 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135434190258 0.0758088955206 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183151804487 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101607915532 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 48.8420337079 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 12.1743820225 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.86 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 11.2143820225 61% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.