The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
Leaders are those who govern a group of people to attain a specific task or goal. They should have essential qualities of leading the group. They give diections to each individual member so that the allotted task to each can be done in a proper manner which would conducive in being the group successful. Sometimes, they demand feedback from the team members for the decisions they are taking for the entire team. It is not always neccessary that it is the quality of the best leader always. I disagree with this statement.
The quality of taking feedback of the decision from team members sometimes implies that the leader is not confident of his/her decision. The leader might be skepticleof his decisions about the team. It may indicate that he/she is unsure about the results of the decision or action taken in lieu of doing good to the team. To illustrate, If some leader always do poll of decision whether it should be implemented or not, he/she is dependent on others for checking the validity of the decisions. He/She is not having independent thought process, thereby if any emergency comes he/she remains in flux of his opinions ot ideas. It implies that leader can not be the best leader. Thus, I reject this statement.
Sometimes, the leader takes feedback from the people whom they lead in order to ask whether they are happy with his/her decision taken. It will boost the morale of the leader if all give good feedback. It will let the leader to get familiar with the different problems being faced by the people whom the leader govern. Thus, the leader can get chance to know about the loopholes in his/her governance. He/she can then correct the governance if loopholes are present. If the governance would be good, it will make poeople or team members happy. The leader would be more respected in that case. Such a leader would be leveraged with the title of best leader.
As we see that if the leader encourages the people whom they govern for their feedback or seek the validity of his decision, it may not always be the chracterstic of the good leader or best leader. Therfore, I reject this statement.
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 16
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 50
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 50
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead 50
- Technology while apparently aimed to simplify our lives only makes our lives more complicated 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper manner" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t the allotted task to each can be done in a proper manner which would conducive in being the grou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 485, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...at it is the quality of the best leader always. I disagree with this statement. The...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 642, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
...eader would be leveraged with the title of best leader. As we see that if the leader e...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74663072776 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45482872285 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44204851752 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 534.6 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1468847447 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5652173913 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1304347826 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.21951772744 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362836065122 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106264051061 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108415052986 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252655423926 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084125353822 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 48.8420337079 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.