True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself.
To claim that a true success can be assessed chiefly by taking the goals one set for oneself, is an oversimplification. Although the goals behind successes are important, there are different aspect which regarding the situation, take precedence over evaluating the goals.
To begin with, many are counterexamples attesting that having a good intention toward a victory is not a considerable matter, when a damaging measure is taken toward that triumph. The road to hell is paved with good intentions, is the proverb summarizing my point. The unjustifiable acts have been done by the human beings which even their presumably good intentions cannot justify them. Consider those who advocate the success of the United States of America in World War II say that U.S.A’s aim was only to finish the World War. Of course, termination of genocides in the World War is merited. But ending of a war cannot be a true success when it is achieved by turning 129.000 people into ashes by atomic bombing toward the victory of the U.S.A.. Therefore the means of attainment of a purpose is a preponderating factor than is what primarily aimed per se.
Secondly, a true success is measured also by assessing what benefits go to whom_ whatever was the purpose of the achiever. In this sense, consider many researchers who made huge accomplishments out of serendipity. In discoveries and inventions, the researcher who is in search of answering a question, accidentally finds an answer to another question. For instance, uranium salts which spontaneously emit lights, accidentally darkened the negative films and was discovered by Henri Becquerel. While he was not intended to find this phenomena, can we not attribute a true success to his discovery which further made X-ray photography possible? Indeed we can, since the benefits of all the human beings of this discovery is important, rather than what was the intention of its discoverer.
However, the author is not entirely wrong in claiming that goals are an important factor behind any true success. A veneer of success, shatters when it is divulged that one has set a selfish and a dishonest aim for oneself. Becoming a doctor, for instance, is a success in having a career, since it takes a long time for one to become a doctor. But, where one who is becoming a doctor only recognize patients as costumers to derive money from, the goal here undermines the success because it is selfish and inhuman. Therefore, we see that to evaluate a goal we should take into consideration a set of different factors.
In short, as discussed, when a goal is succeed, there are different aspects that we should take into account. Besides evaluating the goal behind a success, we should also analyze the measures taken toward to realize a goal, and also evaluate what benefits gets to whom after it is accomplished.
- When Stanley Park first opened it was the largest most heavily used public park in town It is still the largest park but it is no longer heavily used Video cameras mounted in the park s parking lots last month revealed the park s drop in popularity the re 70
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh, most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type o 60
- The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement."Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire, because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate. Another advantage is that housing costs 67
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central 70
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at 70
Comments
Full essay evaluations
Comments 1: if you are not sure the words, don't use them.
Definitions of 'per se'
adverb
by or in itself or themselves; intrinsically.
"it is not these facts per se that are important"
synonyms: in itself, of itself, by itself, in and of itself, as such, intrinsically, by its very nature, in essence, by definition, essentially
comments 2: what do you mean 'after "U.S.A."'?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 480 350
No. of Characters: 2302 1500
No. of Different Words: 239 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.681 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.796 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.858 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 170 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 129 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 88 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 56 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.948 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.619 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.28 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.508 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.147 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
hi again, I need your help to
hi again, I need your help to be sure whether using "per se" is correct:
"Therefore the means of attainment of a purpose is a preponderating factor than is what primarily aimed per se."
Here I think it is OK? is it?
And next question:
Should I use a punctuation after an abbreviation? In here my sentence is ended with U.S.A.. Is it correct to put two punctuation in a raw?
Oceans of thanks
Q1: it is OK. Take 'what
Q1: it is OK. Take 'what primarily aimed' as a noun.
Q2: One punctuation is enough.
have I used "per se" at the end of paragraph 2, in a correct way?
+
can I use "." after "U.S.A.", at the end of a sentence?