The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The provided graphic demonstrates the average quantity of fish and three distinct types of red meat namely beef, lamb, and chicken consumed by a person in a European nation over the course of 25 years, starting in 1979.
Overall, it is manifest that while the consumption of chicken underwent a steady acceleration, the other counterparts shared an inverse trend during the surveyed period.
As is shown in the line graph, a person ate only around 60 grams of fish in 1979, exhibiting a lower rank than all the other categories provided. This pattern experienced a stabilization and shrank slightly to exactly 50 grams weekly in the year 2004. Likewise, commencing at the climax, beef consumption fluctuated and registered a notable descent to roughly 160 grams by 25 years later.
Now, turning to the other details, in comparison to the pattern in 1979, which saw the same statistic with 150 grams per week, it was witnessed opposite tendency between lamp and chicken. From 1989 to 2004, whilst declining lambs in meal nutrition by approximately 90 grams, Europeans opted for consuming chicken more frequently with 250 grams per week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries 89
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other while others think that people have become more independent 89
- The graph below shows population variation in three wildlife species from 2011 to 2016 in North America and its coastal areas Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12299465241 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80216965326 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695187165775 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0941074566 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.857142857 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167779551086 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674751965184 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334044082516 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882300873212 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343604046786 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.