The information about the selling of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five different nations is depicted by the rendered two tables. The data has been calibrated in millions of euros.
To begin with, in 1999, 1.5 and 3 million euros sales of coffee were in the UK and Switzerland. However, there had been drastic increase noticed after 5 years, it was increased by 18.5 and 3 correspondingly. Moreover, in Denmark and Sweden, there were 0.2 million euros of the positive difference in 2004, it was 2 and 1 in 2004. 1 million euros trading of coffee were in Belgium, in 1999 then it was rose by 0.7 until 2004.
Moving towards, in 1999, 15 million euros of trading of bananas were in Switzerland then a dramatic increase was seen in 2004, it comprised 47 million euros. Sweden and Denmark is the only nation where the trades of bananas were declined, which were decreased by 0.8 and 0.1 in 2004, which were 1 and 0.9. Whereas, there was a rapid increase observed in the sales of bananas in the UK and Belgium, which were 5.5 and 4 in 2004 respectively.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the sales of coffee were increased in all five European nations in five years.
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 67
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 58
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, then, whereas, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60648148148 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74151875219 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486111111111 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3999235935 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261409853359 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126506058508 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11611105177 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195761719984 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890817101006 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.