The earlier we can ban smoking in public places, the better it would be for human kind. Having foreven this same, many offices and government bodies imposed strict ban on public smoking. This measure is generally applauded by the majority of mass. However, the opposing minority interrupt this ban as an act of arrest on one's free will. Let us discourse on this moot issue below.
It is generally agreed and even proven with scientific studies, that smoking is injurious to health. Health problems that can introduce are numerous. Cancer is among the major detrimental effect of smoking on one's health. As it is rightly displaced on the cigar packets, smoking is one of the primary factor leading to cancer.
Furthermore, effects of smoking on the systematic and peripheral circulation of in the human body are appaling, as put forward by medical experts. The havoc of this insane habbit is so horrifying, that research points towards its possible harmful effects on unborn child, even. Smoking is considered as culprit among the congenital birth defects and anomalies.
Another factor significant to this context would be the financial constraints imposed by smoking. In many developing countries, where people work on daily wages, the habit of amoking has an astrocious impact on their quality of life. In the majority of the mediocre families, around the world, smoking drains the significant part of their family budget. For example, I witnessed with many problems with reference to my father being a chronic smoker and the financial crises it caused.
The amount of carbon and other toxic elements exhaled to the atmosphere by active smoker has reachedsuch dizzy heights, that its effect on oassive smoker is more or less a reality now. In fact, that effect of first hand smoker is seen permeable to even the second and third hand smoker in the spectrum. The significance of the public ban on smoking is not justifying but necessity as it calls for. As a result, it is widely banned in the some offices and institutions. Awareness programmes are being conducted all around the world against the habit.
Though the public ban on smoking is an individual constraint to one's freedom, considering the passive effects of smoking I would strongly accort with the ban. In my view, this would be a punitive measure to safeguard the health and wealth of the public and the society.
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet newspapers will remain the most important source of news 56
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today s life Others argue that the history is a value source of information Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...As a result, it is widely banned in the some offices and institutions. Awareness pro...
^^^^
Line 6, column 65, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... smoking is an individual constraint to ones freedom, considering the passive effect...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, for example, in fact, as a result, in my view, more or less, with reference to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00251889169 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63707148549 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534005037783 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.080023696 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.347826087 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2608695652 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86956521739 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225040163948 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637592087489 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529198274506 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12054923408 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367131502019 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.