The charts below give information about world spending and population.
The pie charts compare the shares of four major items in global expenditure, as well as how
global population is distributed.
Overall, the largest proportion of money in the world is allocated to food, while transport,
housing and clothing are other significant items. Moreover, the population of Asia is responsible
for the largest group of humans.
According to the first chart, the most significant amounts are paid for food (almost a quarter of
global expenditure) and transport (almost 20%), while housing also accounts for a considerable
proportion. The least among the four is spent on clothing (merely 6 percent) and the remaining
40% is spent on a variety of other items.
The second chart shows that there is a significant difference between the population of Asia
and that of other continents since approximately 3 out of every 5 human beings live in Asia.
Europe and the Americas share similar proportions and together are host to roughly one-third of
the world’s population, while the inhabitants of Africa form a mere one-tenth.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
2024-11-29 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
2024-11-20 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
- Some people think that products should be made to last as long as possible while others think making the products cheap is more important Discuss both views and express your own opinion 92
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a di erence To what extent do you agree or disagree 26
- The maps provide a comparison of the town of Seatown and the changes it has witnessed from 1995 to the present day 82
- The graph below shows the percentage of overweight men and women in Australia between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, third, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27647058824 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95186879989 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3218016072 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 13.0 3.83414634146 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120204936352 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543974566612 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310359863983 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0434752949417 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467722100698 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.