The charts show the proportion of holidaymakers of one region staying in different types of accommodation in three different year's.
The pie charts illustrate the ratio of the travelers of one region staying in different types of lodging in 1965, 1985, and 2005.
Overall, staying with friends/ relatives became the very best preference earlier but it reduced with a period. However, the hotel turned into less favored through the holidaymakers but it was an increase with duration.
Firstly, the ratio of the travelers who staying with friends/ relatives in 1965, which was the highest proportion about 55% and it decreased with time period by 35% and 33% in 1985 and 1005 respectively.
Secondly, a hotel was preferred less only by 16% in 1965, but it was surged by 37% in 1985 as well as increased by 1% in 2005.
Finally, camping and caravans fluctuated through the three years. In which, travelers have been selected to accommodate in camping by 15% in 1965 and 18% in 1985. However, it became decreased by 12% in 2005. Caravans were chosen by 14% in 1965 which was declined by 4% in 1985 and again it rose by 20% in 2005.
- the diagram below shows how a mechanical arm works and how the joints that make up the arm function in the same way as those in a human arm summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevent 68
- The tables below give information about the amount of beer and fruit juice consumed per person per year in different cities 65
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education The first chartshows the reasons why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how peoplethink the costs of adult education should be shared Write a report for a university lecturer desc 67
- The charts show the proportion of holidaymakers of one region staying in different types of accommodation in three different year s 73
- prevention tan cure out of country s health budget a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measure to what extent do you agree or diagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73295454545 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57721034677 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539772727273 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0434813138 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5555555556 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143792094349 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060886826442 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968204452639 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940797409321 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118629895594 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.