The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts give explanations for people's choice between cycling and driving to work.
Overall, most cyclists argue for their option in view of health and fitness and less pollution. Meanwhile, comfort is the determining factor making people opt for driving to workplace.
In details, 60% of bicycle travellers commute to work by it inasmuch as they take their constitution and the bicycle's eco-friendliness into account. Meanwhile, 15% of cyclists assume that they will come up against no parking problems. Others, however, believe that bicycles include no costs(13%) and they are faster than cars(12%).
On the other hand, two-fifth of car users suppose that cars offer them comfort, which is almost double the rate of drivers whose home is far from workplace. Faster than cycling and carrying things to work are the primary reasons for 28% of people, 14% on each. Finally, 11% of people driving to work regard the car as a safer means of transport compared to bicycles.
- The charts below give information about world forest in five different regions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
- The charts below give information about world forest in five different regions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
- The charts below give information about world forest in five different regions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10625 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63449918153 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68125 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1130776024 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16633452467 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638061913708 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437558880933 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925894957358 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028993359494 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.