Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?
Scientific research is a subject of intense debate within Western countries and across the region. Equally relevant to this issue is the fundamental question concerning whether or not a scientific investigation is supposed to be conducted and supervised by the governments rather than private corporations. A sizable percentage of researchers propose that it is of great necessity for the government to implement scientific research. From my perspective, I strongly concur with this argument.
In the first place, public endorsement is what to put one's priority in. It is apparent that the potentiality of human resources has a tendency to bring studying efficiency, which enhances public trust. In fact, renowned scientific specialists play a pivotal role as a potential resource of the governments since they have a tremendous amount of experience, knowledge, and skills in a specific field. Recent studies by Oxford university reveal that the community puts its thorough confidence on the projects participated by scientific experts rather than non-professional people who have few experiences. More prominently, the government has significant charisma to conduct and supervise a scientific investigation which influences immensely on society. To exemplify, residents confide extremely in the Vietnamese government's policy related to solutions for the Covid-19 disease which has been a perilous epidemic in recent years. Initially succeeding in the prevention of disease spread, the Vietnamese government has significant charisma, which continuously gains residents' trust regarding recent scientific resolution for the Covid-19 disease. Incontrovertibly, the potentiality of human resources and the government's charisma lay the first step for public endorsement.
In the second place. studying convenience ranks an equivalent place in the essence. It is inevitable that the governments' financial budget is likely to improve facilities for research. In interviews, researchers concur that modern facilities support considerably to their studies in laboratories while lacking facilities prevent their work from smooth. Furthermore, monetary incentives encourage them to work efficiently. More significantly, abundant information is a vital element enhancing scientific accessibility. In one study by Oxford University, learners are divided into two groups to conduct scientific research regarding bird migration. One is provided little information, therefore they must look for materials in other sources while the other is supplied a numerous amount of information. The result indicates that the latter reach their conclusion which is substantially accurate without spending much time whereas the former conducts within an inordinate amount of time. In fact only do the governments have confidential and momentous data to reinforce a scientific investigation. Beyond any doubt, the government's financial budget and abundant information set the platform for studying convenience.
In closing, public endorsement and studying convenience are the convincing reasons for my agreement. Additionally, several scientific research consisting of imprecise information baffle individuals, which is necessary for the governments to establish harsh measures controlling this circumstance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-07 | jenifer Le | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-29 | jenifer Le | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-29 | jenifer Le | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | jenifer Le | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | mbn250 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...estern countries and across the region. Equally relevant to this issue is the fundament...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... is the fundamental question concerning whether or not a scientific investigation is supposed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...lace, public endorsement is what to put ones priority in. It is apparent that the po...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1209, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...potentiality of human resources and the governments charisma lay the first step for public ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Studying
...c endorsement. In the second place. studying convenience ranks an equivalent place i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the platform for studying convenience. In closing, public endorsement and study...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, regarding, second, so, therefore, whereas, while, in fact, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 8.3376753507 348% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2826.0 1615.20841683 175% => OK
No of words: 462.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.11688311688 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39728113158 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5670995671 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 879.3 506.74238477 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2520659879 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.04 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.48 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.12 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199425349846 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536561628746 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057059778261 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134786187203 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606481059112 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.22 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 78.4519038076 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.