salvage logging
The readind passage indicates that salvage logging has advantages to the damaged forest and to the economy. However, based on the listening, such thing is certainly not as wonderful as the passage decribled, and might results more damage in the long run.
First of all, the reading claims that clean up dead trees to make room for fresh new trees to grown after a terrible fire is helpful for forest to recover from the disaster. However, the professor contradicts what the reading states. She argues that dead trees will convert to nutritions and enrich the soil for new trees. Salvage logging removes natural nutrigetion resource from forest and might cause the forest more damage.
Second, the author of the reading holds the opinion that salvage logging will also contribute to the overall heath of the forest by reducing the dangers of infestation. But the professor in the lecture refutes this point by question that insects are bad or not for the forest. She points out that, in fact, insects have been living there for a hundred years while the forest is in good condition. Besides, insects are food source to bird, from which the forest will benifit for the long term.
Finally, according to the reading part, we learn that there are still a large amount of wood after a natural disaster are usable to the industries whose production is from the forest, and it will request more worker for salvage logging. In contrast, the listening disagrees with that. It contends that the economic benefits bringed by disasters are tiny and not continuous. Besides, transporting thoes wood by helicopters is very expensive. It's worth note that addtional jobs created by salvage logging require trainied workers which locals are not having that experience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nally, according to the reading part, we learn that there are still a large amoun...
^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'worker' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: worker
...is from the forest, and it will request more worker for salvage logging. In contrast, the l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, still, while, in contrast, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03082191781 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43474364919 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565068493151 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9939811041 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9333333333 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223145161121 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822973124036 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127383175908 0.0662205650399 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150913528819 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391977442917 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.