Agnostids
The reading passage presents three theories on how agnostids lived. They are agbistuds may be free-swimming predator that eat small animals, dwelled on the seafloor, and living on large organisms as prasites. However, according to the listening, the professor believes there are severe weaknesses in the mentioned three theories.
First of all, the reading claims that small animials were also good swimmers and active predator. Therefore, agnostids with small size can also live as a predator and there were substential small organisms as their food resoureces. Howeverm, the professor in the lecture contradicts what the reading states. She argues that animal must have large well-devopled eyes to be a qualified hunter. But asnostids only obtained a tiny poorly-develp eyes, so for them must have another sense organ to chase after their preys, which does not find any evidence.
Second, the author of the reading holds the opinion that agnostids can be seafloor dwellers as other primitive arthropods. But the professor in the lecture refutes this point by present that fact the agnostids occupied multi areas accorss large distance. This indicates that agnostids are able to move fast, which is unusual for seal dwellers, because organisms living on the seafloor are unable to move swiftly.
Finally, from the reading, we learn that it's possible the agnostida were parasites lived on primitive fish or other large arthropods as many modern-day arthropods. In contrast, the listening challenges its couterpart. It contends that arthropods lived as parasites have a small population. Because too many parasites would kill the animals that they lived on. However, evidence shows that the population of agnostids is pretty large, which rules out the theory.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-05 | YasamanEsml | 86 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | reza_fattahi | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-30 | reza_fattahi | 86 | view |
| 2023-01-30 | reza_fattahi | 75 | view |
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street while others think that it is the right thing to do Which point of view do you think is correct and why 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and examples 83
- Movies and television programs have more negative effect than positive effect on the way young people behave 90
- Spartacus the rebel leader who fought against the Romans with an army of fellow escaped slaves is one of the most famous figures in ancient Roman history Spartacus led his men against their Roman oppressors and managed to defeat the Roman army in several 78
- Agree or disagree it s better to Chose a university whose graduates have good job opportunities than a university who has famous professors 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d as parasites have a small population. Because too many parasites would kill the anima...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43636363636 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71369712129 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596363636364 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.280128968 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4375 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217507417757 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075322414298 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992739235618 0.0662205650399 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143341599646 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088792053061 0.0443174109184 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.