Two charts below show the percentage of qualified graduates in particular countries.
The information about educated people who had been done their degrees by different fields in specific nation in 1980 and 2008 is illustrated in pie chart.
In an overview, maximum students had been done by Master science in both years,however, PHD arts less demandable.
After having a glimpse it can be clearly seen that 25% people qualified with first-degree arts in 1980,whilst they decreased in second time period which was 11%. Furthermore, there was negligible difference between 1980 and 2008 for getting master arts by learner that was 12% in former year and 13% in later year. In addition, only 2% degree holders qualified in 1980 but it inclined in 2008 with 5%.
Probingfurther, near about one fifth students had graduated through first degree science, alternatively, This trend dropped till 10% in later year. Moreover, students showed to stable demand on Master Science in both period it was 29%. Finally, maximum degree holders achieved their degree with 29% in 1980 and 30% in 2008 atparticular country
- Two charts below show the percentage of qualified graduates in particular countries summarise in the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- Some animals species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea What are the reason What is solution to solve them 56
- In their advertising business nowadays usually emphasise that their product are new in same way Why is this Do you think positive or negative development 89
- Two charts below show the percentage of qualified graduates in particular countries 11
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , however
...een done by Master science in both years,however, PHD arts less demandable. After hav...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21084337349 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7831390497 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650602409639 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6139219794 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0725948973538 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340745310943 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0209715063821 0.0843802449381 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0391020710091 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267967145708 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.