Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to work in a larger company than a small one.
It is obvious that the development of the modern world leads to a proliferation of several businesses. Direct proportionately, new-born workers are struggling to opt for an appropriate company which will adhere to them for their whole future which, in fact, depends on the notion of each person. I and a multitude of advocates lean on the idea that it is better to work for a large companion.
First of all, that a large company is much more prestigious and renowned is a plus point toward applicants. A large corporation has had a long time to ameliorate itself as well as build its own reputation. As a result, applicants are satisfied with the certain vibes that a large company brings back, which means that their future career will be more stable if they are admitted to a huge association. On the contrary, a small company does not guarantee applicants’ future inasmuch as it may go out of business someday. If this does happen, workers may become unemployed and suffer from lack of money. Consequently, not only workers themselves but also their family may have to live an austere and miserable life.
Secondly, gigantic resources of a large organization allow workers to show their strength to the fullest extent. Modern and expensive equipment is installed to facilitate workers’ productive proportion. For example, Google’s workplace has a wide range of rooms including PC rooms, entertainment rooms, gym and so on, and its employees are encouraged to work when they like and how they like. Needless to say that only a large company with excessive funds can build all of these places to support workers, giving them the most convenient environment to work in. Furthermore, net-working enlargement is one of the benefits of a big company. Here, workers meet and befriend a multitude of adept people from whom they can learn and get advice.
Finally, advancement in a small company is by no means easy as most people expect. Employees have to wait for someone to leave (which happens less often in a small company), or hope that someone creates a new position (which also doesn’t happen often). And, while workers may get a title change each year, if their job duties aren’t changing, they are not really growing professionally. Unfortunately, employees have no other choice but to leave the company if they are not happy with their current position or how quickly they are promoted.
In conclusion, a large company assures stability of their workers’ future life along with providing them with a myriad buttressment to expand their ability, while a small one might not be able to support its workers as they anticipate.
- The chart below shows the annual number of rental and sales in various formats of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 92
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives Do you agree or disagree 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 538, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ition or how quickly they are promoted. In conclusion, a large company assures s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97511312217 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88786792054 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545248868778 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1788390732 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.95 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134639049086 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421622690272 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432822451064 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831510685771 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235580621711 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.