Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Do you agree/disagree with this view?
In this day and age, many recruiters prefer university graduate with official degree rather than whose have only life experience for their specific position in their companies. From my perspective, I totally disagree with this point of view and this essay is going to present some major reasons to demonstrate this.
Regarding the phenomenon above, the companies tend to rely on employees' specific academic degrees that may be the proper manner for the majority recruitment process. To be more detailed, a university degree partly is the solid evidence of one’s accomplishment in a specific field that also confirms one’s knowledge and capacity in that domain. Moreover, the employee's applications who have the qualification would stand a higher chance of being hired by the company. Furthermore, there are myriad job applications to companies in a day, recruits may not make sure to check all of that and they tend to give chances for who have qualifications and ignore the rest to saving time and less money wasted on determining the worker’s ability by evaluating their performance.
Besides the university degree, rich life experience and valuable characteristics should be given equal consideration during the hire of new employees process. While experienced workers are incapable to adapt to different working environments, not all university graduates are equipped with sufficient soft skills which are highly needed in the workplace to tackling suddenly unexpected problems. For instance, employees just graduating from university can make a loss in companies profit if they can not handle difficult and flexible tasks in other to work with other parties, persuade a client to sign a contract. In addition, some high ego graduated workers maybe break the company’s principles and are unlikely to take responsibility for their performance.
In conclusion, formal qualifications are considered the priority ways to recruit new members for some company position, I strongly disagree with this point of view. Life experience and willingness should become the initial factors for company success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | linhdung01 | 50 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of revenue for three film types romance comedies and action horror for a Hollywood film studio from 1970 to 2000 84
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much in 2022 78
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Do you agree disagree with this view 89
- Some international companies are very powerful now and many people believe that it is a negative development Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your reasons and relevant examples 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 653, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...is process has to be done within a long period of time under close observation from the manage...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.525606469 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1728055792 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592991913747 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.0335100564 49.4020404114 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 186.363636364 106.682146367 175% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.7272727273 20.7667163134 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229306688808 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897587244977 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529688994531 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148068875876 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315819458107 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.0946893788 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.39 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.0 9.78957915832 225% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 10.7795591182 204% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.