Four pie charts illustrates the inquiries results about querying adolescents the major reasons for spending times with their phones in one country in Africa from 2016 to 2019.
In general, what stands out from the graph is that the biggest cause for juveniles to using their phone was social media over all 4 year period. Another interesting point is that phone calls was the least reason for children to play with their mobile devices between 2016 and 2019.
Looking at the chart, we can see that social networks was the main reason why youngsters want to keep playing with their phones in 2019 and 2018 by accounted for 56% and 51% respectively. Likewise, social networks was also mainly contribute to the reason why teens love spending time with their mobile devices in 2016 and 2017 by responsible for 50% and 48% in turn. Email was took the second place about the major reason why youngsters want to using their phones in 2016, 2017, 2018 by contributing 25%, 24%, 20% respectively. Meanwhile, email was took the third place and contributed to 19% of the main reason why kids love playing with phones in the year 2019. The figures for digital camera between 2016 and 2017 were stayed unchanged with 15% whereas the amount in 2018 and 2019 were 18% and 20% respectively. Ultimately, phone calls was the least major causes for juveniles in an African country to play their mobile devices over 4 year period. The amount of phone calls effected to youngsters for keep using their phone during 4 years from 2016 to 2019 were 10%, 13%, 11% and 5% in turn.
- As computers can translate all languages very quickly and accurately learning a foreign language is a waste of time To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
- Many countries are spending a huge amount of money on supporting their competitors to take part in some worldwide sports competition Others argue that it would be better if these countries can spend the money on children to take part in sports To what ext 89
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The map below shows the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007 64
- Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations Others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed Discuss these views and give your own opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, likewise, look, second, so, third, whereas, while, as to, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 272.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73897058824 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32636356841 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466911764706 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 18.504323819 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.9 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28453056471 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140569769983 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446760472753 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219214123502 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292431617681 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.