The bar chart gives information on the number of men and women in Britain who continued their education in colleges after leaving school. The data concern three periods of time - the years 1970/71, 1980/81 and 1990/91. As can be seen, it also shows whether the people chose to study part-time or full-time. Overall, the figures of females climbed slowly for both types of further education whereas with men there was only a steady change for the better in full-time education.
If we look at the diagram, it becomes evident that part-time education predominated in all the three periods regardless of the gender of the students. Additionally, in the early seventies neither women nor men tended to pick full-time education. However, the indicator suggested a slight increase in number from period to period, it leading to about 500 students of both genders being occupied in full-time education in the nineties compared to fewer than a hundred of them at the beginning of the seventies.
Surprisingly, the number of men in part-time education declined moderately in the years 1980/81 in comparison with the earlier period.
As for the gender factor, it is stated that in years 1970/71 the number of female students was significantly paltrier than the one of males, especially in part-time education. This trend changed through years, so in the years 1990/91 the number of women in further education even exceeded the number of men.
- Radio and Television Audiences in UK October December 1992
- The chart below shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000
- Radio and Television Audiences in UK October December 1992 60
- Radio and Television Audiences in UK October December 1992 84
- The number of men and women in further education in Britain 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The data concern three periods of time - the years 1970/71, 1980/81 and 1990/91. ...
^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...number from period to period, it leading to about 500 students of both genders be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12765957447 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74037908604 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7768648107 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341289803459 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145017482334 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137329405259 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227432490175 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606979589963 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The data concern three periods of time - the years 1970/71, 1980/81 and 1990/91. ...
^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...number from period to period, it leading to about 500 students of both genders be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12765957447 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74037908604 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7768648107 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341289803459 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145017482334 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137329405259 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227432490175 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606979589963 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.