There is an assumption that children in wealthy families aren’t used to challenges in the real life and always struggle to solve problems in the future. However, it is not necessarily true as they are provided with better facilities, education and career opportunities. This essay will discuss whether ones who were brought up by poor or wealthy circumstances better face adult’s life troubles.
To begin with, poor children support their parents quite more, so they get duties from the early age. That is crucial for adult’s life. Being used to manage yourself from the childhood you can easily make plans, wake up early and never be late. Even if this person got struggled with some life problem, he could with no doubt tackle it. Furthermore, poor children have higher desirability for money than wealthy ones. For example, football and basketball players in poor conditions motivated themselves from day to day in order to get better life. Motivation is indispensably for dealing with troubles, while laziness will destroy everything.
However, children who were raised by wealthy families have greater opportunities to get better education. This leads to that they learn how to overcome obstacles. From the school due to the grading system, they are motivated to achieve something which will help those children to be successful in the future.
Taking into consideration all mentioning above, children from less wealthy families have higher motivation and get used to responsibilities. These help them to deal with problems. In the same way ones that have richer families are qualitatively educated which guarantees them a stable career. I believe that mostly this doesn’t depend on circumstances you were brought up but it depends on how significantly you are motivated to be better from day to day.
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education The first chart shows the reasons why adulta decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared 92
- Crime rates in the UK in the year 2002
- Radio and television audiences
- Radio and Television Audiences in UK October December 1992
- Radio and Television Audiences in UK October December 1992 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for example, no doubt, to begin with, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.264604811 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86013066511 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584192439863 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4983765103 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1176470588 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353426970138 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107769643312 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707316490932 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219949352827 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053443470639 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.