The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources
in a country between 1985 and 2003. Summarize the information by selecting and
reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts displayed below exhibit the percentage of the energy generated from several sources in a particular country between 1985 and 2003. The various sources of energy are natural gas, coal, hydrogen, nuclear, oil, and other renewable energies. It can be well observed that there is a significant increment in the demand of some sources whereas, the others saw a major fall.
Oil contributes to the majority proportion for generating energy in both the years. However, its demand slightly reduced from over a half (52%) in 1985 to nearly two-fifth (39%) by 2003. Similarly, the percentage of energy produced from nuclear sources reduced from over a fifth (22%) to only 17% from 1985 to 2003. On contrary to this, energy generated from natural gas, coal, and other renewable resources escalated from 13%,8% and, 1% in 1985 to 23%,13% and, 4% respectively, by 2003. Additionally, the energy produced from hydrogen remained constant (4%) during both years.
Overall, oil was the major source of energy whereas, other renewable sources produced minimum energy.
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 2006 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the internet every day from 2003 to 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 with projections till 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20348837209 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64658800519 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8048756716 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278368416103 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126129929734 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795607268738 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189247382602 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451369861458 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.