Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Many people believe that universities should focus more on practical aspects of learning rather than emphasizing just theoretical knowledge. Well, I would completely agree with the statement because, through practical and hands-on learning, a student is able to grasp concepts better and retain the information for a longer period of time.
In this fast-paced world, effective methods of learning are the need of an hour. This effectiveness can be established by opting for practical ways of learning things. For example, if a science experiment is carried out in the laboratory, a student is able to understand the deeper concepts of the experiment by conducting and observing the changes that occurred. This kind of understanding would be nearly impossible if University provides only a written document of procedure. Also, after observing things practically, students could retain this knowledge for more time and this will also help them to apply the acquired concepts in plethora of other related experiments.
Additionally, if the university only focuses on imparting theoretical knowledge, students may find learning a mundane task. In such situation, it may alsohappen that he/she discontinues the course due to lack of inner motivation and overly stressed methods of learning. For instance, we come across many examples in which during conversation between students, they find learning things through slides or presentations a tedious task. Even I find it hectic to incorporate and learn things through such methods.
Thus, I believe practical trainings definitely is a better method and should dominate the theoretical techniques of learning as this will help students to maintain the enthusiasm throughout the coursework.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-19 | Ayushi Jain | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | Khanhu010101 | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | Khanhu010101 | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | Lyly241096 | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-30 | Lyly241096 | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 with projections till 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 2006 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 with projections till 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...and retain the information for a longer period of time. In this fast-paced world, effectiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59848484848 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08543595942 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598484848485 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2508258185 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.166666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169931360121 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622638535728 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548390030391 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113895007929 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515051673542 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.