Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
In today’s advanced society, technology has substantially affected the interaction among mankind. While many have opposed to this statement, I believe that the development in technology has revolutionized our way of interacting as it has introduced us to more prominent opportunities.
Technology has created a great deal of impacts on human’s relationships and communication. In the past, it is common to make friends at school or at work, hence people’s friend circles are usually not very wide. However, in the modern society, cutting edge technological devices and applications have allowed us to get in contact with each other more effortlessly and sufficiently. For instance, there are social media applications that were designed solely for the purpose of expanding one’s friend circle such as Facebook or Instagram. Additionally, with those applications, people can communicate through a variety of methods, emailing or messaging and so on which is extremely beneficial for office workers considering that they can be more productive even when staying at home.
Despite some drawbacks technology may bring such as social media addiction and computer fatigue, the benefits of it definitely outweigh the disadvantages. Considering that not only human’s relationships are improved through technological applications, modern digital devices also assist people to contact others on the move, at the same time, which is time-saving, thus productivity in communication is enhanced. Furthermore, expanding one’s friend circle through social media is one way to secure one’s career prospect since public relations is considered a vital element to success and prosperity.
In conclusion, my conviction is that technological advances are undoubtedly a positive development to humankind due to the fact that they facilitate people relationships, interactions with each other and enhance work flow and productivity.
- More and more people want to buy clothes cars and other items with famous brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 67
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate towards buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'drawbacks'' or 'drawback's'?
Suggestion: drawbacks'; drawback's
...en when staying at home. Despite some drawbacks technology may bring such as social med...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, may, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81978798587 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40789959801 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611307420495 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.3692608826 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.727272727 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29069912792 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104233603302 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707270778626 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187363809538 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599867129462 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.