The tables depict how much money France, Austria, Germany, Netherlands, and Norway earned from selling fairtrade-labeled tea and pineapples in two distinctive years – 2010 and 2005.
Overall, throughout the time period, the average sale of tea was somewhere in the vicinity of 3 million euros, whereas that of pineapples clustered from 1.6 to 3 million. However, the former product witnessed several rises on different levels while the former had Norway and Germany as outliers, of which sales decrease significantly over the course of five years.
As per the chart, the amount of tea sold at French fairtrade saw a mere tenfold increase throughout the years – from 2.5 million to 21 million euros. Similarly, the sales of Austria’s and Netherlands’ tea doubled and went up two-thirds, respectively. In addition, when comparing the figures of Germany and Norway, both nearly stagnated with just a slight growth of 0.2 million from 2010 to 2015.
Regarding the chart depicting the pineapple sales of those aforementioned countries, Austria tripled, whereas Germany saw a threefold decrease throughout the time period. Additionally, from only two million euros earned in 2010, in the next five years, France had crossed the six-million-euros mark. Noticeably, Netherlands boosted its sales by five times while Norway lost its profit of nearly 1 million euros.
- Maps show the changes of the lakeside 2000 2009 95
- The charts show where people get their news and how much they trust these sources Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved 84
- The 2 maps below show the changes that have taken place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001 Summarise the best relevant points and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people consider art to be essential and others think it is not Which view do you agree with and why 78
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 212 200
No. of Characters: 1109 1000
No. of Different Words: 121 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.816 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.231 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.894 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 87 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 64 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.014 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.448 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.673 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.047 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4