The tables depict how much money France, Austria, Germany, Netherlands, and Norway earned from selling fairtrade-labeled tea and pineapples in two distinctive years – 2010 and 2005.
Overall, throughout the time period, the average sale of tea was somewhere in the vicinity of 3 million euros, whereas that of pineapples clustered from 1.6 to 3 million. However, the former product witnessed several rises on different levels while the former had Norway and Germany as outliers, of which sales decrease significantly over the course of five years.
As per the chart, the amount of tea sold at French fairtrade saw a mere tenfold increase throughout the years – from 2.5 million to 21 million euros. Similarly, the sales of Austria’s and Netherlands’ tea doubled and went up two-thirds, respectively. In addition, when comparing the figures of Germany and Norway, both nearly stagnated with just a slight growth of 0.2 million from 2010 to 2015.
Regarding the chart depicting the pineapple sales of those aforementioned countries, Austria tripled, whereas Germany saw a threefold decrease throughout the time period. Additionally, from only two million euros earned in 2010, in the next five years, France had crossed the six-million-euros mark. Noticeably, Netherlands boosted its sales by five times while Norway lost its profit of nearly 1 million euros.
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling 81
- In comtemporary society everyone should have equal opportunities in education Therefore universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many people nowadays spend a large part of their free time using a smartphone What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 90
- The table and chart shows data from a survey of library users 78
- The diagram below shows two different processes for manufacturing black tea Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 78
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 212 200
No. of Characters: 1109 1000
No. of Different Words: 121 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.816 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.231 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.894 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 87 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 64 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.014 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.448 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.673 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.047 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4