As mass communication and transport continue to grow, societies are becoming more and more alike leading to a phenomenon known as globalization. Some people fear that globalization will inevitably lead to the total loss of cultural identity. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There is no doubt that these days transport and the community are very widely used these days that connect individuals to the phenomena of globalization. The idea is that whether nations should concern about the loss of their cultural identity. In this essay, I will discuss my personal views.
In terms of the advantage, communication is what allows people to integrate into other countries amicably. Through the media, countries will be approached closely by the global cultural, political, and scientific information. For example, exchanging information across countries can enable poorer countries to expand more efficiently and enhance their economies. As a result, nations are not only able to maintain their culture, language, and customs, they are also proposed to share them with the rest of the globe.
On the other hand, there are some crucial disadvantages. It can be said that worker migration may be responsible for paradoxes when employees from a less developed nation migrate to a more developed country. This can thus have a severe effect, not only on the people and the economy but also on the entire civilization. In addition, everyone is interested in many different ways in future things such as technology. It's not because the world has gone old habits. However, they are intrigued by a new fashion model. Therefore, cultural identity is not going to remain.
In general, it is evident that globalization leading identity culture to the end. Therefore, it is believed that old generations are a reason of teaching about culture to their children. They must ensure steps are taken to prevent this phenomenon from deteriorating further.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-24 | hungdung2507 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | Duyanh1201 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-15 | caomaiphuong050605 | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-10 | Trang Lưu Bảo Thắng | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-09 | LE ANH HUY | 85 | view |
- The table below shows the number of students living in the UK gaining teacher training qualifications in 2005 6 and 2006 7 and the proportion of male qualifiers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 75
- Creativity is the key to problem solving To what extent do you agree with this statement Give reasons to support your answer 89
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 78
- Creativity is the key to problem solving To what extent do you agree with this statement Give reasons to support your answer 89
- Scientific innovation is always a positive thing and should be encouraged To what extent do you agree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... In addition, everyone is interested in many different ways in future things such as technolog...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ys in future things such as technology. Its not because the world has gone old habi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in general, no doubt, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24060150376 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90278151767 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624060150376 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4558793868 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6470588235 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173905985197 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490779395912 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591102336948 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940244881223 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352332211768 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.