The table below shows the number of students living in the UK gaining teacher training qualifications in 2005/6 and 2006/7, and the proportion of male qualifiers.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table gives the information about the total number of Initial Teacher Training graduating in the United Kingdom in two academic years, 2005/6 and 2006/7, with particular attention being paid to the number of male qualifiers.
In both years, the overall numbers of students remained identical, however, there was a great difference between the number of males and females who qualified.
In 2005/6, out of a total of 31930 students, only 25,8% were males, thereafter, the percentage of males who qualified in 2006/7 was even lower. Particularly, out of a total of 31945 students, only 23,8% of them were male. This is a drop of 1,5%.
The standards for which the students acknowledged were also at variance. The majority of students were certified PGCE, as applied to male students. While the overall quantity of students who were nominated for PGCE fell slightly from 24405 to 23900 a year later, the figure of apprentices was nearly three times as many who registered for BEd and other degrees. There was also a decrease in the number of males who gained this qualification, at about 1,5%.
In general, regarding the number of males who met the requirements for Initial Teacher Training, it is significantly outnumbered by females, and that the proportion of male qualifiers is gradually declining.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03333333333 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78512814346 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561904761905 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.0079098247 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0909090909 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217450582454 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870422493504 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614647495296 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13200788929 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471702370248 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.