The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011.
The line chart compares the information about people of different age groups in a European nation watching a movie in the cinema once a month or more between 2000 and 2011.
It is clear that people aged 15-24 went to the cinema by far the most during the period shown. In addition, the percentage of citizens in all age groups choosing to go to the cinema for entertainment increased gradually over an 11-year period.
In 2000, individuals aged 15-24 who went to the cinema once a month or more accounted for just over 15%, while the figure for people in the 7-14 age group was slightly lower, at exactly 10%. Meanwhile, around 4% of citizens who are 25 to 35 years old travelled to the cinema at least once a month, compared to only approximately 2% of 35-and-over-year-old citizens.
Eleven years later, the proportion of 15-24-year-old individuals going to the cinema increased dramatically to just over 50%, despite a fluctuation in between. At the same time, the figures for people who were 7-14 and 25-35 rose gradually, and stayed at the same proportion in 2011, at 30% each. Additionally, the percentage of people in the 35 and older age group who chose to entertain in the cinema went up slightly to roughly 12% in 2011.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-01 | huong789 | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | naufalrahman96 | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | naufalrahman96 | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | kiran sanghera | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-16 | Phạm Thùy Linh | 84 | view |
- The bar chart describes the sales of different goods in pounds in the UK over four seasons in 2015 23
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 84
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram below shows how to recycle organic waste to produce fertiliser compost Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...y 10%. Meanwhile, around 4% of citizens who are 25 to 35 years old travelled to the cin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77209302326 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90991851151 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4951700304 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364309828302 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179464029889 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127363015875 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260024168915 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102730842633 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.