The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011
The line chart illustrates changes in the percentage of people going to the cinema once a month by age group in a European country from 2000 to 2011.
Overall, the percentage of people visiting the cinema once a month was highest amongst those aged 15 to 24 years-old, and lowest amongst those aged 35 and over. Additionally, the figures for all age groups increased over the given period.
In 2000, 15% of people aged 15 to 24 years-old visited the cinema once a month. This figure tripled over the following five and a half years, and continued to rise to over 50% by 2011. Meanwhile, only approximately 3% of people aged 35 and over visited the cinema at least once a month. This figure also gradually rose over the years to reach approximately 13% in 2011.
Very similar trends could be seen for those aged 7-14 and 2535. Beginning at approximately 10% and 5% respectively both figures continued to rise over the measured period to both reach 30% by 2011.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-01 | huong789 | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | naufalrahman96 | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | naufalrahman96 | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | kiran sanghera | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-16 | Phạm Thùy Linh | 84 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 69
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- People who decide on a career path early in their lives and keep to it are more likely to have a satisfying working life than those who change jobs frequently To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The charts below give information on the amount of various fruits which was consumed in a South American country between 1969 and the present 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by age group in a European country from 2000 to 2011. Overall, the percentage...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72352941176 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60954463142 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523529411765 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6636430951 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2222222222 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309663373167 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148804021046 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158922171106 0.0843802449381 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241966498816 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.18671584321 0.0819641961636 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.