The given bar chart illustrates how much internet has used at four different areas within 1998 to 2004 in the UK. Units are measured in percentage(of people).
Overall, Majority of the individual had preffered to use internet at their home and Library was the least popular modes of data consumtion for a given time period.
In 1998 and 2004 almost similar amount observed at about 55% in the case of using internet in the house. Nearly 50% value was in the both middle years. In all four years, internet usage for the working purpose remaind constant with the value of less than 30% except in the final year when it was nearly 15%.
A little fluctuation was noticed around 20% at college; where in initial two years exact 20% data used, following that in 2002 this value was increased by 5% and in final year scale reached at close to the 18%. More than 10% and below 20% internet surfed in the liberary for years 1998 and 2000 respectively. latter both the years remained unchanged near to the 15%.
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 89
- It is becoming more and more difficult to escape the influence of the media on our lives Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living in a media rich society 89
- Health experts believe that walking is a good exercise for health However people are walking less nowadays Why is this happening How can people be encouraged to walk more 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comaparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart below shows the sector contribution to India s gross domestic product from 1960to 2000 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 309, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Latter
...y for years 1998 and 2000 respectively. latter both the years remained unchanged near ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59776536313 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29647674423 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625698324022 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.3404903262 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4444444444 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.222222222222 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177372764555 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711416233688 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599967541851 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993916488322 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448884779569 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.