Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities( ex: cost, environment). Discuss both views and give opinions.
It is appreciated that the authorities should allocate their budget to high-speed public vehicles; meanwhile, others believe that spending expenditure on other sectors such as cost and environment is more feasible. Both these schools of thought hold valid arguments. From my perspective, I am truly in agreement with the second viewpoint. This essay will take both sides into consideration and give my verdict.
On one hand, it is tangible that there should be disbursement on faster modes of mass transportations as it is indispensable. Initially, quicker public vehicles will be time-efficient for commuting and mitigate traffic congestion in big cities. Therefore, individuals possess more spare time and there would be a significant increase in productivity at work as employees have additional time to accomplish proposed tasks. Besides, faster cross-country public transport public services are instrumental in easing cross-region travel, creating a narrower gap between urban and rural areas.
On the other hand, other spheres, which I personally believe to be of more significance, are also worth being invested in such as cost and environment as such advantages may be associated with a shift towards public transport. Firstly, government subsidies, which are usually accompanied by higher costs, might fail to accommodate public demand. Reducing the fees will help to make it available to citizens, even the low-income ones. Moreover, funding for public transport should take into consideration its contribution to environmental protection. This is especially essential as, in the modern world, air pollution caused by toxic fumes released by private means of transportation is at an alarming level so the need for reducing it is urgent.
In conclusion, in terms of the improvement of public transport, ensuring sustainability and lowering the cost should be given more priority than boosting its speed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-18 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people focus on news in their country while others think it is more important to be aware of international news Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people are of the opinion that women should play an equal role in police or military forces like the army Others believe that this work is unsuitable for women Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Many people say that cooking and eating healthily is better for individuals health than consuming ready meals To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...nd, it is tangible that there should be disbursement on faster modes of mass transportations...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the need for reducing it is urgent. In conclusion, in terms of the improveme...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65172413793 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25691252438 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641379310345 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6466614592 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.071428571 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271248935732 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079990523986 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671976285261 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160673557386 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230479591773 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.