Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside. Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities. Discuss both views and give your opinions.
Time flies, dragging drastic alterations in human positive awareness as to which living places directly exert a positive impact on health improvement. Even though people can reap the merits when setting down in both cities and countries, I favor the latter more due to some compelling reasons.
Admittedly, the facilities and information availability would assist city people in achieving a healthier lifestyle. Firstly, there are multitudes of public amenities and gym centers located overwhelmingly in the urban, which is considered an outstanding point in boosting citizens’ desire for working out and staying fit. This is because the local governments have facilitated their residents by installing a wide array of exercising equipment in most open spaces in public parks where people from walks of life are able to experience freely. Additionally, gym centers in an attempt to draw potential customers have organized myriad activities for people of all ages such as doing yoga on the beach every morning Sundays or running competitions, which positively affects humans in changing their sedentary lifestyles. Furthermore, not only social media but also local newspapers deliberately publicize methods to live a healthier life and shield people from the deterioration in health due to the excessive amount of fast food and ready meals. Without consistent announcements and warnings issued from the local governments and health experts in big cities, the degradation in health is out of the question.
By contrast, I express strong advocate of having a healthier lifestyle at ease when people reside in the countryside. It is facile to recognize a cacophony of mixed sounds from a dog barking to a cork signaling the dawn in a village, which features the life of any people here. Therefore, people can get up early without the urge of a senior family member or the squeaking noise from an alarm that sparks a better mood for early birds instead of a negative emotion. What even makes the countryside a better living habitat is the quality of air. It is undeniable that city people are inclined to suffer from respiratory diseases, caused by the number of dust and particles floating in the air; however, the reverse is true in rural areas. Not multiple vehicles running and the aids of shadow trees appearing on both sides of the streets in absorbing poisonous emissions offer villagers qualified air to breathe. In the interim, almost all industrial zones are located mostly in cosmopolitan cities which release a huge amount of sewage into the sea and ground. This practice does harm fiercely human life; on the opposite, with the minimal clusters of factories and companies, inhabitants in the country, fortunately, save themselves from these dangerous agents.
All things considered, notwithstanding the advantages from the habitats in cities and countries, I suppose health would be enhanced when having lives in rural spaces.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-27 | nav200408@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2022-07-13 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-13 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-13 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-26 | vidung | 89 | view |
- Task 1 The bar chart shows the types of media to get the daily news by age group in 2011 73
- The chart shows the number of visitors to a local cinema according to age in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work in a larger company than a small one 88
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019
- The charts below give information about the price of tickets on one airline between Sydney and Melbourne Australia over a two week period in 2013 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, as to, i suppose, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2472.0 1615.20841683 153% => OK
No of words: 468.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28205128205 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91989818165 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 176.041082164 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602564102564 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 785.7 506.74238477 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6638083279 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.411764706 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5294117647 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153971390439 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498596761149 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307567740564 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100098755751 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0057740836855 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 78.4519038076 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.