There is continuous increase in the population. Thus, the demands for building more houses are being necessity. Thus, government is facing many obstacles to cope up with this issue. It is true that necessity is the mother of invention thus as it means our needs make new ways to invent things. In this essay, I shall discuss both the statements.
Let us throw some light on the first opinion about building new houses. First of all, in this conventional world, everywhere there is congestion. So, the prime reason is devoid of space. Technology lends a helping hand to create sky scrapers. Consequently, there are requirements of money as it is well known fact that money makes the mare go which means money run the things. Secondly, a good architecture is crucial due to cope up with natural disasters as earthquakes. Because the height of sky scrapers are too high. Additionally, huge material and the garbage of making buildings required to be to proper dispose. Moreover, the quality is the base of a building. If the material is not good then it makes a huge disaster for several people who live there.
Now, let us elaborate the other view to try to save the environment. Governments and the other organization are giving supportive hands to preserve the greenery. It becomes a burning question these days. To begin with, the prime measure is to grow more trees. So the atmosphere gives pleasant and fresh air. Secondly, to find out the better solution to convert garbage into energy. For example, in Italy and Denmark, large number of garbage is changed into electricity. Next, due to congestion of more houses and road construction, the space for outside activities is declined. Hence, more parks and playgrounds are made. In the modern houses, the uses of wood material is reduced specifically trying to stop deforestation.
Hammering the final nail, it can be concluded that some preventions are better to save environment and to fulfil the raising demands. In my point of view, people should choose the sky-scrapers and use recycled products that never spoil anything in the ecosystem.
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 67
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Recent research has shown that within the Europian Union the largest differences between the earnings of men and women exists in the UK Many equal rights compaigners believe that immediate actions should be taken to close the gender gap To what extent do 84
- Some people believe that technology has made a man more sociable and others think that it has made us less sociable Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people believe that the best way to spend a holiday in a foreign country is to go out to meet people instead of staying in the hotel most of the time what is your opinion give reasons and include relevant examples from your own experience 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 472, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... with natural disasters as earthquakes. Because the height of sky scrapers are too high...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, first of all, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97159090909 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81083513626 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605113636364 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6063102768 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.8148148148 106.682146367 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.037037037 20.7667163134 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96296296296 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126410070009 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295252497027 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321686137031 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693917625313 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432097517146 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.0946893788 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 472, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... with natural disasters as earthquakes. Because the height of sky scrapers are too high...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, first of all, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97159090909 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81083513626 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605113636364 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6063102768 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.8148148148 106.682146367 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.037037037 20.7667163134 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96296296296 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126410070009 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295252497027 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321686137031 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693917625313 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432097517146 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.0946893788 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.