The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in
London, 2000-2010.
The graph above illustrates data about the income of three bakeries in London over a decade period between 2000 and 2010.
What stands out from the chat is that there were significant upward trends in the income of Bernie's Buns and Robbie's Bakery, whereas Lovely Loaves witnessed a substantial decline over the the years. Another interesting point to mention is that despite having the biggest income of the three bakeries throughout the first half of the decade, Lovely Loaves's earning remarkably worsen in the second half.
In 2000, Bernies's Bun earned 20000 pounds, which meant that it had the smallest income of the three bakeries that year, while Lovely Loaves earned most with just over 80000 pounds. During the first half of the decade, Robbie's Bakery's earnings remained stable around under 60000 pounds, whereas that of the other bakeries fluctuated considerably. Lovely Loaves experienced a sharp drop in 2005 with the earning of 60000 pounds, in spite of peaking in sales last year with almost 100000 pounds income. In 2010, Robbie's Bakery earned most out of the three bakeries with over 100000 pounds.
In general, all three bakeries saw a dramatic fluctuation in sales over the decade of 2000 and 2010.
- Computers are increasingly used in education in which areas do you think are computers more important and in which areas are teachers more important 56
- The graph shows data about the average Saturday sales of two bakeries in London in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- Although most people are richer than in the past modern life seems very stressful and the number of people suffering from stress is at record levels What are the main causes of stress in modern life and how could stress be reduced 95
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 84
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...es witnessed a substantial decline over the the years. Another interesting point to men...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...es witnessed a substantial decline over the the years. Another interesting point to men...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, whereas, while, in general, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05970149254 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28320811167 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547263681592 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1521566871 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.125 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327014760456 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169466262912 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135974628843 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237740204764 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139706547174 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.