The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The change in the amount of earnings annually in three London bakeries from 2000 to 2010 is displayed in the line graph.
Overall, Lovely Loaves was the most popular bakery in London in the initial year. However, this bakery experienced a downward trend of yearly income with some changes, and the remaining counterparts showed a reverse.
Initially, the most well-known bakery in London was Lovely Loaves, showing the gaining at about 80,000 pound. When it comes to other bake makers, the earnings of Robbie’s Bakery had more lucrative at approximately threefold of Bernie’s Burn at only 20,000 pound.
Eventually, Robbie’s Bakery gained popularity dramatically, breaking the record as the highest annual earnings slightly more than a hundred pound. Simultaneously, the amount of money earned by Barnie's Burn increased significantly to three times of the beginning period. This contrasts to those inclining, the figure for the rest witnessed a decrease of income to be a half of it in the first period.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-02 hxyav 84 view
2022-02-17 Дониёр 84 view
2022-01-10 Vuthungan 78 view
2021-12-15 mnaufaln 78 view
2021-12-15 naufalrahman96 73 view
Essays by user mnaufaln :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31677018634 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88555946997 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627329192547 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8313850912 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220893538125 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990643116407 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919336598338 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15248948693 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100402938447 0.0819641961636 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.