The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed, employed or further education in 1980, 1990, and 2000.
The pie charts reveal changes in the rate of students’ status after graduating from an Australian secondary school in three separate years, 1980, 1990 and 2000. Overall, the figure for unemployed people witnessed an upward trend while that for who choosing further education experienced a downward trend. Additionally, the percentage of unemployed students always possessed the lowest figure among all categories during these years surveyed.
Although the proportion of students who pursued further education was by far the highest in the first year, accounting for half of the total rate, this figure showed a significant decrease to 37% in 20 years later. By contrast, there was a remarkable growth in the figure for who being employed. To be exact, this percentage increase by 15% from 40% in 1980 to 55% in 2000, which was the highest position in 2000. Regarding the category of “unemployment”, there was a downward trend with a fluctuation over the period. In detail, its percentage increase by 2% from 10% to 12% in the first ten years then dropping to 8% in the last year.
- The chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women doing regular physical activity in 2010 73
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face is this a positive or negative development 84
- The pie charts above show the comparison of the proportion of energy produced by different sources in an European country in 1995 and 2005 80
- The chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women doing regular physical activity in 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...itnessed an upward trend while that for who choosing further education experienced ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08379888268 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91818036817 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614525139665 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8085225181 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25647924994 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962103719874 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809099301299 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204872654025 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683362885204 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.